Refugee Policy and Foreign Policy: Examining Policy Linkage in Chinese Relations with North Korea, Myanmar, and Vietnam

Lam, Jasmine

Refugee Policy and Foreign Policy: Examining Policy Linkage in Chinese Relations with North Korea, Myanmar, and Vietnam

By Jasmine Lam
2013, Vol. 5 No. 10 | pg. 1/6 | »

IN THIS ARTICLE

China & North Korea

Historic Overview and Sino-North Korean Relations

Refugee Treatment

China & Myanmar

Historic Overview and Sino-Burmese Relations

Refugee Treatment

China & Vietnam

Historic Overview and Sino-Vietnamese Relations

Refugee Treatment

KEYWORDS

Keywords:International Relations Foreign Policy Refugees Migration Linkage China Vietnam North Korea Myanmar

Abstract

This paper analyzes state refugee policies through the lenses of foreign policy behavior and policy linkage. The case studies compare variations in Chinese state policies towards refugees from North Korea, Myanmar, and Vietnam. Through an additional examination of China’s relations with these states, it is found that fluctuations in levels of cooperation, which characterize bilateral relations, help explain differences in state refugee policies. Specifically, the higher level of cooperation between state A and B, the less likely the receiving state A will admit the refugees of state B, and vice versa.

In the field of international development studies, practical and academic work relating to forced migration has expanded since the contemporary international refugee regime was established after World War II. Literature on refugee studies is vast, but there exists a distinct lack of research linking forced migration to international relations. Past analysis predominantly focused on movement from developing to developed nations, where in contrast an overview of the international refugee regime shows there is increasing flow of movement between developing countries. Secondly, refugee policies are highly political in nature and linked to state foreign policy behaviour, although this connection has been likewise neglected. The current literature fails to make sense of why states pursue certain refugee policies over others, and why there are variations in policies enacted toward different groups of refugees in one country. By analyzing the refugee policies of China and its neighbouring countries, this paper found that refugee policies follow levels of cooperation between states.

The case studies of this paper compare China’s policies towards incoming refugees across three states: Vietnam, Myanmar, and North Korea. These three states share substantial borders with China and contributed inflows of over 20,000 refugees and above. Findings from literature and news sources demonstrate differences in Chinese policies in treatment towards the three refugee groups. For the wave of Vietnamese refugees entering China in 1978, China responded by fully integrating the 250,000 refugees into state farms, fishing and mining industries, and small businesses. Toward Burmese refugees, China followed a policy of temporary relief in the nature of makeshift tents, food, and hospitality, while still refusing to recognize them as refugees. For North Korean refugees, China pursued a strict policy of refusal and repatriation.

After an examination into the bilateral relations of China and the origin states of refugees, as well as China’s policy towards each of these groups, this paper argues that the variable that best explains the discrepancy in policy is the level of cooperation defining their bilateral relations. More specifically, the higher level of cooperation between states A and B, the less likely the receiving state A will admit the refugees of state B. Likewise, the lower the level of cooperation between state A and B, the more likely the receiving state A will admit the refugees of state B. Each case study then falls along a spectrum of refugee policies, ranging from “refusal and repatriation” on the end of high level of cooperation, to “temporary assistance” in the middle, and “acceptance and resettlement” at the other end characterized by a low level of cooperation. From this perspective, state refugee policies are intrinsically tied to foreign policy behaviour. With these analyses, the empirical purpose of this paper is to expand on the discussion on South-South migration studies, and the theoretical purpose is to integrate perspectives of international relations into international development studies.

This analysis is structured as follows: first, a consideration of the common definition of refugees is provided along with an overview of the international refugee regime. In the next section, a review of existing literature on refugee policy and international relations is presented, with emphasis given to the importance of linking the two fields. In the third section, the treatment of each refugee group (North Korea, Myanmar, and Vietnam) in China is examined. Next, a discussion is undertaken as to why other variables are less fitting in explaining variations in Chinese refugee policies. Lastly, the conclusion attempts to extend the findings of this paper to refugee policies in other states.

North Korean refugees fleeing Hungnam on December 19, 1950

Source: U.S. Department of Defense

II. Literature Review

The study of foreign policy as a sub-field within the larger discipline of international relations began in the 1950s. Foreign policy is defined as “the strategy or approach chosen by the national government to achieve its goals in its relations with external entities,” and foreign policy behaviour is “the observable artefacts of foreign policy… [and] may include the categorization of such behaviour, such as along conflict-cooperation continua.”1 This includes foreign policy decision-making, bureaucratic and organizational politics, psychological aspects in formulation of foreign policy, and comparative foreign policy.2 The analysis of foreign policy borrows perspectives from the classic international relations schools of thoughts, realism, liberalism, and constructivism.3 Contemporary research in this field is increasingly looking at the interplay between different levels – individual, nation-state, and international – in formulating foreign policy.4 In addition, there have been more efforts to utilize findings from various social science disciplines.5

Secondly, under the broader scholarship of forced migration studies, researchers have begun to comment on the use of refugee policies as a tool of foreign policy in the 1980s. In “International Factors in the Formation of Refugee Movements,” receiving states can attract refugees and create a “pull” factor with a policy that encourages admission, or with a restrictive policy that is poorly enforced.6 This becomes a tool of foreign policy since an open-door policy “usually implies condemnation of relevant government for persecuting its citizens, or at least failing to afford them protection.”7 Teitelbaum argues along the same line with a more normative tone.8 He finds that mass expulsions from sending side can be used as tool to “destabilize or embarrass foreign policy adversaries,” while for receiving countries, refugee admission can serve to “embarrass and discredit adversary nations.”9 In Refugee and International Relations, Loescher sums up these observations in that “government responses to refugee movements from neighbouring or distant countries are greatly influenced by the relations between sending and receiving nations.”10 These authors together highlight the connection between refugee policies and foreign policy.

In the 21^st century, however, literature explicitly linking the greater disciplines of international relations and forced migration studies is still lacking. This is pointed out most openly in Refugees in International Relations, a compilation of essays resulting from a lecture series by both international relations and forced migration studies scholars at the University of Oxford.11 These essays point to the reasons why the two fields can benefit from learning from one another, as they overlap in the areas of “international cooperation, globalization, human rights, international organizations, regime complexity, non-state actors, regionalism, North-South relations, and security.”12 Representing the school of realism, Jack Snyder’s article suggests the reason why realist scholars have often overlooked this field is because of realist tendency to reject all elements relating to humanitarianism, as it is considered a non-security goal.13 Similarly, Myron Weiner expressed scepticism in partnerships between states and humanitarian institutions, as governments place national interest as paramount in foreign policy decision-making, while humanitarian institutions form policies based on ethical and moral values.14 Nonetheless, Snyder points out that humanitarian actions can be viewed through a consequentialist approach, where “good intentions” are only pursued if they “achieve good results.”15 This suggests that humanitarian objectives can be used as instruments to pursue state interests, and thus should not be readily dismissed in the analysis of international relations.

Lastly, there has been development in expanding literature linking the two fields, most prominently where it relates to refugees and conflicts in the developing world. In Refugee Manipulation, Steve Stedman and Fred Tanner demonstrate how refugees and the refugee regime can be used as resources of war, and its implications for international security.16 Furthermore, it is found that since the early 1990s, refugees have more and more often been catalysts in spreading conflict beyond borders.17

Interdisciplinary studies incorporating forced migration and international relations are growing, but explicit literature on linkages between refugee policies and foreign policy is missing. This review also reveals the benefits of expanding research in this area, as refugee policies are innately tied to politics. Furthermore, the study of foreign policy involves conflict-cooperation in state behaviour, entailing an examination of this in bilateral relations. The next section analyszes the case studies of China and its three neighbouring countries, placing each finding along a spectrum of high-to-low levels of cooperation. Through this, the paper challenges existing literature and reveals new connections between foreign and refugee policy.Continued on Next Page »

1 2 3 4 5 6

Allison, Graham. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: HarperCollins, 1971.

Bai, Fan. “Siwang xianshang zhengzha de beihan xiaonanmin” (The deathly struggle of North Korean refugees), Epoch Times, June 14, 2009. Accessed August 21, 2012. http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/9/6/12/n2555767.htm.

Betts, Alexander and Gil Loescher, ed. Refugees in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

---. “Refugees in International Relations.” In Refugees in International Relations, edited by Alexander Betts and Gil Loescher, 1-27. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Bourne, James. “No Assistance for Kachin Refugees.” Radio Free Asia, June 26, 2012. Accessed July 19, 2012. http://www.rfa.org/english/news/burma/refugees-06262012165817.html/.

Branigan, Tania. “Burma’s military junta accused of torturing and killing ethnic rebels.” The Guardian, December 18, 2011. Accessed July 18, 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/18/burma-military-junta-kachin-rebels.

Byman, Daniel L. and Kenneth M. Pollack. “Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In.” International Security 25:4 (2001): 107-146.

Cai, Jian. “The Korea Nuclear Crisis: The Changing Sino-DPRK Relationship.” Asian Perspective 34:1 (2010): 137-158.

Chan, Royston. “China tents dismantled as refugees return to Myanmar.” Reuters, September 1, 2009. Accessed July 25, 2012. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2009/09/01/uk-china-myanmar-sb-idUKTRE5800WI20090901.

Chang, C. Y. “Overseas Chinese in China’s Policy.” The China Quarterly 82 (June 1980): 281-303.

Charney, Michael. “U Nu, China and the ‘Burmese’ Cold War: Propaganda in Burma in the 1950s.” In The Cold War in Asia: The Battle for Hearts and Minds, edited by Zheng Yangwen, Hong Liu and Michael Szonyi, 41-58. Boston: Brill, 2010.

Checkel, Jeffrey T. “Constructivism and foreign policy.” In Foreign Policy: theories, actors, cases, edited by Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield and Tim Dunne, 71-82. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Chen, Jian. “China and the First Indo-China War, 1950-54.” The China Quarterly 133 (1993): 85-110.

---. “China’s Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69.” The China Quarterly 142 (June 1995): 356-387.

Cheng, Xiaohe. “The Evolution of Sino-North Korean Relations in the 1960s.” Asian Perspective 34:2 (2010): 173-199.

“China accused of forcing Burma refugees back to war zone.” The Guardian, June 26, 2012. Accessed July 18, 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/26/china-accused-returning-burma-refugees.

“China building North Korea fence.” Taipei Times, October 18, 2006. Accessed August 17, 2012. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2006/10/18/2003332245.

Chiu, Hungdah. “China’s Legal Position on Protecting Chinese Residents in Vietnam.” The American Journal of International Law 74:3 (1980): 685-689.

Donnell, John C. “Vietnam 1979: Year of Calamity.” Asian Survey 20:1 (1980): 19-32.

Doyle, Michael W. “Liberalism and foreign policy.” In Foreign Policy: theories, actors, cases, edited by Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield and Tim Dunne, 49-70. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Ganesan, N. “Myanmar-China Relations: Interlocking Interests but Independent Output.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 12:1 (2011): 95-111.

Goma, Daniel. “The Chinese-Korean Border Issue: An Analysis of a Contested Frontier.” Asian Survey 46:6 (2006): 867-880.

Guo, Ming. Zhong Yue guanxi yanbian sishinian (The Evolution of Sino-Vietnamese Relations over the Past Forty Years). Nanning, China: Guangxi renmin chubanshe, 1992.

Fan, Hongwei. “Sino-Burmese Relations 1949-1953.” In China in the World: Contemporary Issues and Perspectives, edited by Emile Kok-Kheng Yeoh and Joanne Hoi-Lee Loh, 70-84. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of China Studies, 2008.

Fan, Shouyi, trans. “Jilaizhi, zeanzhi: 20 wan yuenan nanmin zai zhongguo shengcun diaocha” (Now that they have come, we must help them settle down: an investigation of the living conditions of 200,000 Vietnamese refugees in China). China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House (2007): 13-15.

Forced Migration Online. “What is forced migration?” Last modified January 27, 2012. Accessed July 15, 2012. http://www.forcedmigration.org/about/whatisfm/what-is-forced-migration/.

Fuller, T. “Refugees Flee to China as Fighting Breaks Out in Myanmar.” New York Times, August 29^th, 2009.

Haggard, Stephan and Marcus Noland. Witness to Transformation: Refugee Insights into North Korea. Washington, DC: Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2011.

Harden, Blaine. Escape from Camp 14: One Man’s Remarkable Odyssey from North Korea to Freedom in the West. London: The Penguin Group, 2012.

Halperin, Morton H. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1974.

Hudson, Valerie M. “The History and Evolution of Foreign Policy Analysis.” In Foreign Policy: theories, actors, cases, edited by Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield and Tim Dunne, 11-29. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Human Rights Watch. “The Invisible Exodus: North Korean in the PRC.” November 2002, 14:8 (C). http://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/northkorea/.

“Hydropower Dams Fuelling Conflict in Burma.” Burma Rivers Network, June 15, 2011. Accessed July 24, 2012. http://www.burmapartnership.org/2011/06/hydropower-dams-fuelling-conflict-in-burma/.

Jagan, Larry. “Border war rattles China-Myanmar ties.” Asia Times, September 1, 2009. Accessed July 25, 2012. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/KI01Ae04.html.

Keely, Charles B. “How Nation-States Create and Respond to Refugee Flows.” International Migration Review 30:4 (Winter 1996): 1046-1066.

Kim, Hyeungkyu. “From a buffer zone to a strategic burden: evolving Sino-North Korea relations during the Hu Jintao era.” The Korean Journal of Defence Analysis 22:1 (2010): 57-74.

“Kim Jong-un meets with senior Chinese officials.” The Telegraph, August 3, 2012. Accessed August 16, 2012. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9448404/Kim-Jong-un-meets-with-senior-Chinese-officials.html.

Kim, Taekyoon. “Strategizing aid: US-China food aid relations to North Korea in the 1990s.” International Relations of Asia-Pacific 12 (2012): 41-70.

Ko, Htwe. “Chinese authorities push Kachin refugees back into Burma.” Democratic Voice of Burma, July 18, 2012. Accessed July 18, 2012. http://www.dvb.no/news/chinese-authorities-push-kachin-refugees-back-into-burma/22870.

Kraus, Charles. “A border region ‘exuded with militant friendship’: Provincial narratives of China’s participation in the First Indochina War, 1949-1954.” Cold War History 12:3 (2011): 495-514.

Kurlantzick, Joshua. “Myanmar: The Next Failed State?” Current History 110:737 (2011): 242-248.

Lam, Tom. “The Exodus of Hoa Refugees from Vietnam and their Settlement in Guangxi: China’s Refugee Settlement Strategies.” Journal of Refugee Studies 13:4 (2000): 374-390.

Lee, Keumsoon. The Border-crossing North Koreans: Current Situations and Future Prospects. Korea Institute for National Unification, 2006.

Lintner, Bertil. “Realpolitik and the Myanmar Spring.” Foreign Policy, November 30, 2011. Accessed July 24, 2012. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/11/30/democracy_myanmar_china_clinton?page=0,1.

Lischer, Sarah Kenyon. Dangerous Sanctuaries: Refugee Camps, Civil War, and the Dilemma of Humanitarian Aid. New York: Cornell University Press, 2005.

Liu, Ming. “China and the North Korean Crisis: Facing Test and Transition.” Pacific Affairs 76:3 (2003): 347-373.

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Civil Government. New York: Everyman’s Library, 1924.

Loescher, Gil. “Introduction.” In Refugee and International Relations, edited by Gil Loescher and Laila Monahan, 1-33. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.

McCarthy,Thomas. “China and North Korean ‘Refugees’.” Special Report, Northeast Asia Peace and Security Network (2002).

McGowan, P. and H. B. Shapiro. The Comparative Study of Foreign Policy: A Survey of Scientific Findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1973.

Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China. “Trade with Countries and Regions in Asia (2010/01-04).” Last modified May 26, 2010. Accessed August 16, 2012. http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/statistic/lanmubb/ASEAN/201005/20100506934001.html.

Moregnthau, Han. Politics Among Nations. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 1948.

“Myanmar border inhabitants begin to return from China as situation calms.” Xinhua News, August 30, 2009. Accessed July 25, 2012. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-08/30/content_11966205.htm.

“Myanmar fighters cross into China.” Al Jazeera, August 30, 2009. Accessed July 25, 2012. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2009/08/20098306161918344.html.

Myint-U, Thant. Where China Meets India. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

“North Korea’s Kim Jong-un may be planning first China trip.” The Telegraph, July 31, 2012. Accessed August 16, 2012. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9440146/North-Koreas-Kim-Jong-un-may-be-planning-first-China-trip.html.

Owen, Norman G. et al., “Burma becomes Myanmar.” In The Emergence of Modern Southeast Asia, edited by Norman G. Owen et al., 497-506. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005.

Path, Kosal. “The economic factor in the Sino-Vietnamese split, 1972-75: An analysis of Vietnamese archival sources.” Cold War History 11:4 (2011): 519-555.

Poon, Kim Shee. “The Political Economy of China-Myanmar Relations: Strategic and Economic Dimensions.” Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies 1 (2002): 33-53.

Qu, Aiguo. “Chinese supporters in the operations to assist Vietnam and resist America.” Paper presented at the “International Workshop on New Evidence on China, Southeast Aisa and the Vietnam War,” Hong Kong, January 11-12, 2000.

“Refugees of Rhetoric Victims in a neighbourly conflict.” Time Magazine 112:6, August 7, 1978.

Rose, Gideon. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51:1 (October 1998): 144-172.

Scalapino, Robert. “China and Korean reunification – a neighbour’s concerns.” In Korea’s Future and the Great Powers, edited by Nicholas Eberstadt and Richard J. Ellings, 107-124. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2001.

“Seoul urges China on North Korea refugees.” BBC News, February 22, 2012. Accessed August 21, 2012. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-17123208.

Smith, Matthew F. “Isolated in Yunnan: Kachin Refugees from Burma in China’s Yunnan Province.” Human Rights Watch (June 2012). http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/china0612_forinsertForUpload.pdf.

Snyder, Jack. “Realism, Refugees, and Strategies of Humanitarianism.” In Refugees in International Relations, edited by Alexander Betts and Gil Loescher, 29-52. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Snyder, Richard C., H.W. Bruck, and Burton Sapin. Decision-Making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University, Organizational Behaviour Section, 1954.

Stedman, Stephen John and Fred Tanner. Refugee Manipulation: War, Politics, and the Abuse of Human Suffering. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2003.

Storey, Ian. “Emerging Fault Lines in Sino-Burmese Relations: The Kokang Incident.” China Brief 9:18 (2009): 5-8.

Teitelbaum, Michael S. “Immigration, refugees, and foreign policy.” International Organization 38:3 (Summer 1984): 429-50.

United Nations General Assembly. “Situation of human rights in Myanmar.” Last modified March 13, 2007. Accessed August 21, 2012. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/508/29/PDF/N0650829.pdf?OpenElement.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. “Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.” Geneva, 1967. Accessed August 22, 2012, http://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. “North Koreans in China: UNHCR asks for access.” Last modified January 21, 2003. Accessed August 16, 2012. http://www.unhcr.org/3e2d3f98f.html.

United Nations Security Council. “Security Council Fails to Adopt Draft Resolution on Myanmar Owing to Negative Votes by China, Russia Federation.” Last modified January 12, 2007. Accessed August 21, 2012. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/sc8939.doc.htm.

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. “23.6 Refugee and Asylee Adjustment under Section 209 of the Act.” Last modified June 21, 2006. Accessed August 22, 2012. http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/AFM/HTML/AFM/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-8624/0-0-0-9785.html.

Wain, Barry. “The Indochina Refugee Crisis.” Foreign Affairs 58:1 (1979): 160-180.

Watts, Jonathan. “Dozens killed in Burma amid clashes over Chinese dams.” The Guardian, June 16, 2011. Accessed July 24, 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/16/china-burma-hydropower-clashes.

Weiner, Myron. “The Clash of Norms – Dilemmas in Refugee Policies.” Journal of Refugee Studies 11:4 (1998): 433-453.

Wohlforth, William C. “Realism and foreign policy.” In Foreign Policy: theories, actors, cases, edited by Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield and Tim Dunne, 31-48. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Zhai, Qiang. China and the Vietnam Wars, 1950-1965. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2000.

Zhan, Debin. “Chinese People’s Understanding of the Korean Unification Issue.” Asian Social Science 8:3 (2012): 63-74.

Zhang, Xiaoming. “China’s 1979 War with Vietnam: A Reassessment.” The China Quarterly 184 (December 2005): 851-874.

“Zhonghua renmin gongheguo he Chaoxian minzhu zhuyi renmin gongheguo zhengfu lianhe gongbao” (Joint Communiqué of the People’s Republic and the Government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea). People’s Daily, April 9^th, 1970.

Zolberg, Aristide R., Astri Suhrke and Sergio Aguayo. “International Factors in the Formation of Refugee Movements.” International Migration Review 20:2 (Summer 1986): 151-169.

Endnotes

1.) Valerie M. Hudson, “The History and Evolution of Foreign Policy Analysis,” in Foreign Policy: theories, actors, cases, ed. Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield and Tim Dunne (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 12.

2.) For foreign policy decision-making, see Richard C. Snyder, H.W. Bruck, and Burton Sapin, Decision-Making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University, Organizational Behaviour Section, 1954). For bureaucratic and organizational politics, see Graham Allison, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (New York: HarperCollins, 1971); Morton H. Halperin, Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1974). For psychological analyses, see Daniel L. Byman and Kenneth M. Pollack, “Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In,” International Security 25:4 (2001): 107-146. For comparative foreign policy, see P. McGowan and H. B. Shapiro, The Comparative Study of Foreign Policy: A Survey of Scientific Findings (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1973).

3.) See chapters William C. Wohlforth, “Realism and foreign policy”; Michael W. Doyle, “Liberalism and foreign policy;” Jeffrey T. Checkel, “Constructivism and foreign policy,” in Foreign Policy: theories, actors, cases, ed. Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield and Tim Dunne (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 31-82.

4.) See Gideon Rose, “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics 51:1 (October 1998): 144-172.

5.) Hudson, 27.

6.) Aristide R. Zolberg, Astri Suhrke and Sergio Aguayo, “International Factors in the Formation of Refugee Movements,” International Migration Review 20:2 (Summer 1986): 155.

7.) Ibid.

8.) Michael S. Teitelbaum, “Immigration, refugees, and foreign policy,” International Organization 38:3 (Summer 1984): 429-50.

9.) Ibid, 437-9.

10.) Gil Loescher, “Introduction,” in Refugee and International Relations, ed. Gil Loescher and Laila Monahan (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), 12.

11.) Alexander Betts and Gil Loescher, ed. Refugees in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

12.) Alexander Betts and Gil Loescher, “Refugees in International Relations,” in Refugees in International Relations, ed. Alexander Betts and Gil Loescher (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 3.

13.) Jack Snyder, “Realism, Refugees, and Strategies of Humanitarianism,” in Refugees in International Relations, ed. Alexander Betts and Gil Loescher (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 29.

14.) Myron Weiner, “The Clash of Norms – Dilemmas in Refugee Policies,” Journal of Refugee Studies 11:4 (1998): 433.

15.) Snyder, “Realism,” 32.

16.) Stephen John Stedman and Fred Tanner, Refugee Manipulation: War, Politics, and the Abuse of Human Suffering (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2003).

17.) Sarah Kenyon Lischer, Dangerous Sanctuaries: Refugee Camps, Civil War, and the Dilemma of Humanitarian Aid (New York: Cornell University Press, 2005).

18.) See John Locke, Two Treatises of Civil Government (New York: Everyman’s Library, 1924); Hans Moregnthau, Politics Among Nations (New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 1948).

19.) “Convention and Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees,” United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Geneva: 1967), accessed August 22, 2012, http://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html.

20.) Charles B. Keely, “How Nation-States Create and Respond to Refugee Flows,” International Migration Review 30:4 (Winter 1996): 1057.

21.) Loescher, 17.

22.) Ibid.

23.) Betts and Loescher, 9.

24.) Ibid, 2.

25.) Ming Liu, “China and the North Korean Crisis: Facing Test and Transition,” Pacific Affairs 76:3 (2003): 348.

26.) China has exerted 2000 years of influence on Korea. Up until 1910, China carried out the role as a patron under a feudal regime, assisting Korea in the development of its political and cultural civilization. See Debin Zhan, “Chinese People’s Understanding of the Korean Unification Issue,” Asian Social Science 8:3 (2012): 64.

27.) Jian Cai, “The Korea Nuclear Crisis: The Changing Sino-DPRK Relationship,” Asian Perspective 34:1 (2010): 152.

28.) Xiaohe Cheng, “The Evolution of Sino-North Korean Relations in the 1960s,” Asian Perspective 34:2 (2010): 176.

29.) Hyeungkyu Kim, “From a buffer zone to a strategic burden: evolving Sino-North Korea relations during the Hu Jintao era,” The Korean Journal of Defence Analysis 22:1 (2010): 59.

30.) Cheng, 180.

31.) Zhan, 57.

32.) Cheng, 191.

33.) Daniel Goma, “The Chinese-Korean Border Issue: An Analysis of a Contested Frontier,” Asian Survey 46:6 (2006): 875.

34.) Cheng, 191-2.

35.) “Zhonghua renmin gongheguo he Chaoxian minzhu zhuyi renmin gongheguo zhengfu lianhe gongbao” (“Joint Communiqué of the People’s Republic and the Governmnet of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”), People’s Daily, April 9^th, 1970.

36.) Taekyoon Kim, “Strategizing aid: US-China food aid relations to North Korea in the 1990s,” International Relations of Asia-Pacific 12 (2012): 55.

37.) Kim, “Strategizing aid,” 56.

38.) Liu, 363-4.

39.) China avoided participation in 1994 because Sino-United States and Sino-North Korean relations were at low-points in the 1990s. Following the Tianamen incident in 1989, United States condemned China for its actions and imposed sanctions. Strained Sino-North Korean relations are described above.

40.) Liu, 347.

41.) Kim, “From a buffer zone,” 66.

42.) See Robert Scalapino, “China and Korean reunification – a neighbour’s concerns,” in Korea’s Future and the Great Powers, ed. Nicholas Eberstadt and Richard J. Ellings (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2001), 107-124.

43.) Stephan Haggard and Marcus Noland, Witness to Transformation: Refugee Insights into North Korea (Washington, DC: Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2011), 30.

44.) Ibid.

45.) Blaine Harden, Escape from Camp 14: One Man’s Remarkable Odyssey from North Korea to Freedom in the West (London: The Penguin Group, 2012), 38.

46.) Keumsoon Lee, The Border-crossing North Koreans: Current Situations and Future Prospects (Korea Institute for National Unification, 2006),10-11.

47.) Ibid, 11.

48.) Human Rights Watch, “The Invisible Exodus: North Korean in the PRC,” November 2002, 14:8 (C), http://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/northkorea/.

49.) Haggard and Noland, 28.

50.) Fan Bai, “Siwang xianshang zhengzha de beihan xiaonanmin” (“The deathly struggle of North Korean refugees”), Epoch Times, June 14, 2009, accessed August 21, 2012, http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/9/6/12/n2555767.htm.

51.) Human Rights Watch.

52.) “China building North Korea fence,” Taipei Times, October 18, 2006, accessed August 17, 2012, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2006/10/18/2003332245.

53.) Liu, 352.

54.) Human Rights Watch.

55.) Liu, 354.

56.) See Thomas McCarthy,“China and North Korean ‘Refugees’,” Special Report, Northeast Asia Peace and Security Network (2002); Liu, 353.

57.) Lee, 41.

58.) Ibid, 42.

59.) Human Rights Watch.

60.) Bai.

61.) Ibid.

62.) Most recently, China is in process of repatriating up to 30 North Koreans who had been arrested. See “Seoul urges China on North Korea refugees,” BBC News, February 22, 2012, accessed August 21, 2012, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-17123208.

63.) The paper will use the name “Burma” (Union of Burma) until the paper begins to discuss the time period after 2008, the year when the Burma changed its official name to Republic of the Union of Myanmar.

64.) Hongwei Fan, “Sino-Burmese Relations 1949-1953,” in China in the World: Contemporary Issues and Perspectives, ed. Emile Kok-Kheng Yeoh and Joanne Hoi-Lee Loh (Kuala Lumpur: Institute of China Studies, 2008), 80.

65.) Ibid, 77.

66.) Michael Charney, “U Nu, China and the ‘Burmese’ Cold War: Propaganda in Burma in the 1950s,” in The Cold War in Asia: The Battle for Hearts and Minds, ed. Zheng Yangwen, Hong Liu and Michael Szonyi (Boston: Brill, 2010), 42.

67.) Joshua Kurlantzick, “Myanmar: The Next Failed State?” Current History 110:737 (2011): 242.

68.) Norman G. Owen et al., “Burma becomes Myanmar,” in The Emergence of Modern Southeast Asia, ed. Norman G. Owen et al. (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005), 500.

69.) N. Ganesan, “Myanmar-China Relations: Interlocking Interests but Independent Output,” Japanese Journal of Political Science 12:1 (2011): 107.

70.) Thant Myint-U, Where China Meets India (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011), 141.

71.) Ibid, 131.

72.) Ganesan, 107.

73.) Ian Storey, “Emerging Fault Lines in Sino-Burmese Relations: The Kokang Incident,” China Brief 9:18 (2009): 6.

74.) Owen et al., 500.

75.) Myint-U, 51.

76.) Ibid, 52.

77.) Ibid, 51.

78.) Poon Kim Shee, “The Political Economy of China-Myanmar Relations: Strategic and Economic Dimensions,” Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies 1 (2002): 34.

79.) From 1962 to 1988, the Ne Win regime of the Burma Socialist Programme Party dominated and pursued socialist policies to develop the country. However, these policies failed to vitalize the economy, and instead plunged Burma into poverty. The state had to rely on authoritarianism to control its citizens. The legacy of totalitarianism remained and Burma has long been criticized for its human rights abuses. Between 1989-1999, multi-party elections were held. This captured the international community’s attention, as Burmese-born, British-National Aung Yang Suu Kyi returned to Burma to lead the democratic movement. However, when the Democratic Party won the elections, the results were ignored. Popular protests against these actions, known infamously as the 8888 Uprising (on August 8^th, 1988), were later violently crushed. The military swept in and established the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC). Since then, Burma has been in the international limelight for its undemocratic practices and human rights abuses. Consequently, economic, political sanctions and isolation from the international community persisted. Nonetheless, in 2003, General and Prime Minister Khin Nyunt announced a 7-step “roadmap” to “disciplined democracy.”

80.) Owen et al., 504.

81.) Storey, 6.

82.) Kurlantzick, 245.

^{^[83]} Bertil Lintner, “Realpolitik and the Myanmar Spring,” Foreign Policy, November 30, 2011, accessed July 24, 2012,

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/11/30/democracy_myanmar_china_clinton?page=0,1.

84.) Ibid, 2.

85.) Myint-U, 72.

86.) Lintner, 2.

87.) “Security Council Fails to Adopt Draft Resolution on Myanmar Owing to Negative Votes by China, Russia Federation,” United Nations Security Council, last modified January 12, 2007, accessed August 21, 2012, http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/sc8939.doc.htm.

88.) Larry Jagan, “Border war rattles China-Myanmar ties,” Asia Times, September 1, 2009, accessed July 25, 2012, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/KI01Ae04.html.

89.) Ibid. Tensions had been building up prior to the attack, as Myanmar troops began to take up positions in the Kokang area in early August. In April 2009, the Burmese government demanded ethnic militias, including the Kokang Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army (MNDAA), United Wa Sate Army, and the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), to disarm or to convert into Border Guard Forces under the command of the Tatmadaw. However, these groups rejected these demands, in fear of losing their autonomy and business interests, as the 1989 ceasefire agreements have allowed them to maintain control over their territory. Earlier in August, the three groups, along with the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) formed an alliance – the Myanmar Peace and Democracy Front – and agreed to not surrender their arms before elections in 2010. On the other hand, for the Burmese government, the elections gave it incentive to demonstrate military victory and authority across the country. To justify the attack, the government claimed that their operation was a drug raid. Effectively, renewed fighting broke two decades of ceasefire.

90.) T. Fuller, “Refugees Flee to China as Fighting Breaks Out in Myanmar,” New York Times, August 29^th, 2009.

91.) “Myanmar fighters cross into China,” Al Jazeera, August 30, 2009, accessed July 25, 2012, http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2009/08/20098306161918344.html.

92.) Jagan.

93.) Royston Chan, “China tents dismantled as refugees return to Myanmar,” Reuters, September 1, 2009, accessed July 25, 2012, http://uk.reuters.com/article/2009/09/01/uk-china-myanmar-sb-idUKTRE5800WI20090901.

94.) “Myanmar border inhabitants begin to return from China as situation calms,” Xinhua News, August 30, 2009, accessed July 25, 2012, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-08/30/content_11966205.htm.

95.) Chan.

^{^[96]} Tania Branigan, “Burma’s military junta accused of torturing and killing ethnic rebels,” The Guardian, December 18, 2011, accessed July 18, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/18/burma-military-junta-kachin-rebels.

^{^[97]}See Jonathan Watts, “Dozens killed in Burma amid clashes over Chinese dams,” The Guardian, June 16, 2011, accessed July 24, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/16/china-burma-hydropower-clashes; “Hydropower Dams Fuelling Conflict in Burma,” Burma Rivers Network, June 15, 2011, accessed July 24, 2012, http://www.burmapartnership.org/2011/06/hydropower-dams-fuelling-conflict-in-burma/.

98.) “Hydropower Dams Fuelling Conflict in Burma.”

99.) James Bourne, “No Assistance for Kachin Refugees,” Radio Free Asia, June 26, 2012, accessed July 19, 2012, http://www.rfa.org/english/news/burma/refugees-06262012165817.html/.

100.) Matthew F. Smith, “Isolated in Yunnan: Kachin Refugees from Burma in China’s Yunnan Province,” Human Rights Watch (June 2012).

^{^[101]} Branigan.

^{^[102]}Bourne.

^{^[103]} “China accused of forcing Burma refugees back to war zone,” The Guardian, June 26, 2012, accessed July 18, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/26/china-accused-returning-burma-refugees.

^{^[104]} Htwe Ko, “Chinese authorities push Kachin refugees back into Burma,” Democratic Voice of Burma, July 18, 2012, accessed July 18, 2012, http://www.dvb.no/news/chinese-authorities-push-kachin-refugees-back-into-burma/22870.

105.) “China accused of forcing Burma refugees back to war zone.”

106.) See Jian Chen, “China and the First Indo-China War, 1950-54,” The China Quarterly 133 (1993): 106; Qiang Zhai, China and the Vietnam Wars, 1950-1965 (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2000), 6.

107.) Charles Kraus, “A border region ‘exuded with militant friendship’: Provincial narratives of China’s participation in the First Indochina War, 1949-1954,” Cold War History 12:3 (2011): 495. After the First Indochina War, the Geneva Conference held on July 21, 1954 divided Vietnam at the 17^th parallel. The north of the parallel was under control of the Viet Minh as the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, while the south became the State of Vietnam. As stipulated at the Geneva Conference, this provisional division was to be upheld until nationwide elections are held in 1956.

108.) Jian Chen, “China’s Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69,” The China Quarterly 142 (June 1995): 356.

109.) Ming Guo, Zhong Yue guanxi yanbian sishinian (The Evolution of Sino-Vietnamese Relations over the Past Forty Years) (Nanning, China: Guangxi renmin chubanshe, 1992), 53.

110.) Chen, “China and the First Indo-China War,” 106.

111.) Ibid, 107-8.

112.) Kosal Path, “The economic factor in the Sino-Vietnamese split, 1972-75: An analysis of Vietnamese archival sources,” Cold War History 11:4 (2011): 519.

113.) Chen, “China’s Involvement,” 358.

114.) Ibid, 359.

115.) Aiguo Qu, “Chinese supporters in the operations to assist Vietnam and resist America” (paper presented at the “International Workshop on New Evidence on China, Southeast Aisa and the Vietnam War,” Hong Kong, January 11-12, 2000): 40.

116.) Chen, “China’s Involvement,” 371.

117.) Ibid, 370.

118.) Ibid, 386.

119.) Path, 522.

120.) First, China was experiencing domestic hardship resulting from the failure of the Cultural Revolution of 1966, which limited China’s capacity to provide the large-scale assistance it was able to before. Second, declining threat from the United States led to President Nixon’s visit to China in 1972. Third, after the Sino-Soviet split, containing Soviet influence in the region became tantamount. It was thus essential to pull Vietnam away from Soviet’s orbit of influence.

121.) Path, 529.

122.) Ibid, 530.

123.) Xiaoming Zhang, “China’s 1979 War with Vietnam: A Reassessment,” The China Quarterly 184 (December 2005): 855.

124.) Path, 540.

125.) John C. Donnell, “Vietnam 1979: Year of Calamity,” Asian Survey 20:1 (1980): 22.

126.) Zhang, 865.

127.) Ibid, 853.

128.) Ibid, 867.

129.) Barry Wain, “The Indochina Refugee Crisis,” Foreign Affairs 58:1 (1979): 161.

130.) Hungdah Chiu, “China’s Legal Position on Protecting Chinese Residents in Vietnam,” The American Journal of International Law 74:3 (1980): 685.

131.) Wain, 163.

132.) Ibid, 163-4.

133.) Donnell, 27.

134.) Wain, 171.

135.) Ibid, 164.

136.) Ibid, 172.

137.) “Refugees of Rhetoric Victims in a neighbourly conflict,” Time Magazine 112:6, August 7, 1978, 52.

138.) Wain, 166.

139.) Shouyi Fan, trans., “Jilaizhi, zeanzhi: 20 wan yuenan nanmin zai zhongguo shengcun diaocha” (Now that they have come, we must help them settle down: an investigation of the living conditions of 200,000 Vietnamese refugees in China), China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House 12 (2007): 15. Office of UNHCR “highly acclaimed the Chinese government’s efforts to make arrangements for settling the refugees in China,” and stated that the “placement of Vietnamese refugees within its borders is one of the most successful models for settlement of refugees.”

140.) Tom Lam, “The Exodus of Hoa Refugees from Vietnam and their Settlement in Guangxi: China’s Refugee Settlement Strategies,” Journal of Refugee Studies 13:4 (2000): 378.

141.) Ibid.

142.) Ibid.

143.) Ibid, 379.

144.) Ibid, 389.

145.) Ibid, 384-386.

146.) “North Koreans in China: UNHCR asks for access,” United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, last modified January 21, 2003, accessed August 16, 2012, http://www.unhcr.org/3e2d3f98f.html.

147.) “Trade with Countries and Regions in Asia (2010/01-04),” Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China, last modified May 26, 2010, accessed August 16, 2012, http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/statistic/lanmubb/ASEAN/201005/20100506934001.html.

148.) Ibid.

149.) C. Y. Chang, “Overseas Chinese in China’s Policy,” The China Quarterly 82 (June 1980): 283.

150.) Chiu, 688.

151.) See “Kim Jong-un meets with senior Chinese officials,” The Telegraph, August 3, 2012, accessed August 16, 2012, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9448404/Kim-Jong-un-meets-with-senior-Chinese-officials.html; “North Korea’s Kim Jong-un may be planning first China trip,” The Telegraph, July 31, 2012, accessed August 16, 2012, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9440146/North-Koreas-Kim-Jong-un-may-be-planning-first-China-trip.html.

152.) “Situation of human rights in Myanmar,” United Nations General Assembly, last modified March 13, 2007, accessed August 21, 2012, http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/508/29/PDF/N0650829.pdf?OpenElement.

153.) Ganesan, 105.

154.) Ibid, 97.

155.) Betts and Loescher, “Refugees in International Relations,” 9.

156.) “23.6 Refugee and Asylee Adjustment under Section 209 of the Act,” United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, last modified June 21, 2006, accessed August 22, 2012, http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/AFM/HTML/AFM/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-8624/0-0-0-9785.html.

Monthly Newsletter Signup

The newsletter highlights recent selections from the journal and useful tips from our blog.

Follow us to get updates from Inquiries Journal in your daily feed.

Follow @inquiriesjourn

Follow IJ

Latest in Political Science

Environmental Politics

2022, Vol. 14 No. 09

Against Eco-Camp: Analyzing the Flaws of the Modern Climate Movement

By Matthew Quintos

This interdisciplinary paper investigates the shortfalls and obstacles to success currently facing the climate movement, examining issues represented by the disconnect between policy and electoral politics, the hypocrisy and blatant indifference... Read Article »

Susan Sontag Climate Change Public Policy Environmental Policy Indigenous Communities

American Politics

2022, Vol. 14 No. 06

How Media Influences the Use of Violence in Protests: An Analysis of the Black Lives Matter and #StopTheSteal Movements

By Clay B. York

Two of the most prevalent protest movements in recent history were the Black Lives Matter and the #StopTheSteal movements. While there are many differences between the two, one of the most prevalent is their use of violence. Whereas the BLM movement... Read Article »

American Politics Media Protest Polarization Black Lives Matter

Comparative Politics

2022, Vol. 14 No. 05

Civil-Military Linkages and Authoritarian Regime Survival During the Arab Spring: Understanding Different Outcomes of the Revolutions

By Darya Maliauskaya

Strong linkages between autocrats and the military are often seen as a necessary condition for authoritarian regime survival in the face of uprising. The Arab Spring of 2011 supports this contention: the armed forces in Libya and Syria suppressed... Read Article »

Authoritarianism Middle East Arab Spring Revolution Protest

Social Movements

2022, Vol. 14 No. 04

Biased Narratives in the Media: Coverage of Fatal Shootings During Black Lives Matter Demonstrations

By Halie A. Hoffman

During the summer of 2020, two fatal shootings occurred following Black Lives Matter protests. The first event involved Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin, and the second Michael Reinoehl in Portland, Oregon. Two shootings, each committed by... Read Article »

Social Movements News Media Online News American Politics American Politics Black Lives Matter

International Relations

2022, Vol. 14 No. 02

Knowledge Production in International Relations: A Poststructural Feminist Critique of Liberal Feminism

By Dana K.J. Al-Thani

In popular international relations (IR) theory, knowledge production is often dismissed as an objective process between the researcher and the empirical world. This article rejects this notion and contends that the process of knowledge production... Read Article »

Poststructuralism Liberalism Feminist Theory International Relations Political Theory

African Politics

2022, Vol. 14 No. 01

The Politics of Nation-Building, Ethnicity, and Democratization in Ethiopia

By Melale G. Hailu

This article explores the political relationship between nation-building, ethnicity, and democracy in the context of Ethiopia. It traces Ethiopia's poltical history, explores the consequential role ethnicity has played in the formation of the modern... Read Article »

Democracy Ethiopia International Development African Politics Nation-Building Democratization

Chinese Politics

2022, Vol. 14 No. 01

China's International Investments Under Xi Jinping: Long Term Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

By Rakkshet Singhaal

The study examines the degree to which Xi Jinping has brought about a strategic shift to the Chinese outward investment pattern and how this may present significant political leverage and military advantages for China in the Indian Ocean Region (... Read Article »

China Foreign Direct Investment International Relations Chinese Politics Belt And Road Initiative Xi Jinping

What are you looking for?

Tweets by @inquiriesjourn

FROM OUR BLOG

7 Big Differences Between College and Graduate School

Writing a Graduate School Personal Statement

The Career Value of the Humanities & Liberal Arts

Inquiries Journal

Social Sciences

Humanities

Arts

Sciences

Featured Article:

Refugee Policy and Foreign Policy: Examining Policy Linkage in Chinese Relations with North Korea, Myanmar, and Vietnam

Abstract

II. Literature Review

Endnotes

From the Inquiries Journal Blog

Related Reading

Monthly Newsletter Signup

Suggested Reading from Inquiries Journal

Follow IJ

Latest in Political Science

What are you looking for?

FROM OUR BLOG

Social Sciences

Humanities

Arts

Sciences

Featured Article:

Refugee Policy and Foreign Policy: Examining Policy Linkage in Chinese Relations with North Korea, Myanmar, and Vietnam

Abstract

II. Literature Review

Endnotes

From the Inquiries Journal Blog

Related Reading

Monthly Newsletter Signup

Suggested Reading from Inquiries Journal

Follow IJ

Latest in Political Science

What are you looking for?

FROM OUR BLOG

Need an Account?