From Discussions VOL. 8 NO. 2Mindfulness and PerfectionismMethodsUndergraduate psychology students completed questionnaires regarding mood, anxiety, worry and attention, listened to a pre-recorded dialogue that explained either mindful meditation or present-moment joy training, and completed questionnaires again. In the Present Moment Joy condition, diaphragmatic breathing was taught and participants practiced the technique for ten minutes. The participants were then taught how to focus on the positive aspects of the present moment including intrinsic motivation and pleasant sensory experiences (the fresh smell, softness, etc) while folding towels for an additional five minutes. In the Mindfulness Meditation group, participants were educated about mindfulness and were led through a twenty-minute Awareness of Breath exercise, which is a form of mindfulness meditation. During this breathing exercise, participants were instructed not to judge their experience or thoughts as positive or negative. MeasuresFrost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS): The FMPS is a 35-item self-report measure that provides a multidimensional assessment of perfectionism and yields a total perfectionism score and scores for six subscalesConcern over Mistakes (CM), Doubts About Actions (DA), Personal Standards (PS), Parental Expectations (PE), Parental Criticism (PC), and Organization (O). The Total Perfectionism Score is the sum of the subscales except O. The CM scale reflects the self-critical and selfevaluative domains of perfectionism; the DA score reflects the uncertainty in the correctness of one’s decisions and actions; the PS score reflects an individual’s desire to set high standards of performance for oneself; the PE and PC scores reflect parent’s influences on an individual’s perfectionism, PE scores reflect expectations that parents have and PC scores reflect the amount of parental criticism; the O score measures an individual’s tendencies to be organized and orderly (Purdon, Antony & Swinson, 1999). The FMPS asks each participant to rate each question from 1strongly disagree to 5-strongly agree. Scores range from 35 to 175, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perfectionism. Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS): The PHLMS is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses mindfulness on two subscales, Acceptance and Awareness. The PHLMS asks participants to rate each question from 1Never to 5Very Often. Scores for the Awareness subscale range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating higher levels of awareness. Scores for the Acceptance subscale are reverse scored and summed, the range is from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptance (Cardaciotto et al., 2008). Beck Depression Inventory (BDI): The BDI is a 21item self-report questionnaire that measures the severity of depression in participants (Beck, Steer & Garbin, 1988). The BDI asks participants to rate each question on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 to 3. Scores range from 0 to 64 with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms. Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ): The PSWQ is a 16-item self-report questionnaire that measures the level of anxiety, or worry, in participants (Brown, Antony & Barlow, 1992). The PSWQ asks participants to rate each question from 1not at all typical to 5-very typical. Scores range from 16 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater worry. Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS): The PANAS is a 20-item self-report assessment that measures state positive affect and negative affect. This measure was given before and after the experimental task (Watson, Clark & Tellegen, 1988). The PANAS asks participants to rate questions from 1very slightly or not at all to 5extremely. Scores for both positive and negative affect range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating more positive and more negative aspect, respectively. State Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults (STAI-S): The STAI-S is a 20-item self-report assessment that has separate assesses current state anxiety in adults. This measure was given before and after the experimental task (Spielberger & Vagg, 1984). The STAI-S asks participants to rate their anxiety of a given situation ranging from 1-almost never to 4-almost always. Scores range from 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. ResultsThe sample characteristics of the population are displayed in Table 1. No significant correlations were found between perfectionism and either of Awareness or Acceptance subscales of mindfulness. A main effect of time (pre-post) was found on the STAI-S F(1,46) = 42.07, p <.001, and on the PANAS in Negative affect F(1,48) = 33.43 p < .001, with both decreasing. No significant difference was found on the PANAS in Positive affect (p > .05). (See figures 1 and 2). A series of hierarchical simultaneous regressions were conducted with perfectionism predicting post manipulation STAI-S and PANAS scores. To control for pre-manipulation STAI-S and PANAS scores, premanipulation scores for the dependent variable were entered in Step 1 and paradigm (Joy or Meditation) was entered in Step 2. In Step 3, perfectionism total scores were simultaneously entered into the equation in order to examine the variance attributable to this variable (above and beyond those entered in Steps 1 and 2) (Table 2).
From the Inquiries Journal Blog   Related ReadingJournalQuest is a free program to help academic student publications increase online readership and distribution. If you are interested in enrolling a journal at your school, please visit the JournalQuest website. Monthly Newsletter SignupThe newsletter highlights recent selections from the journal and useful tips from our blog. Suggested Reading from Inquiries Journal
Inquiries Journal provides undergraduate and graduate students around the world a platform for the wide dissemination of academic work over a range of core disciplines. Representing the work of students from hundreds of institutions around the globe, Inquiries Journal's large database of academic articles is completely free. Learn more | Blog | Submit Follow IJ
Latest in Psychology |
