Assessing Network TV "Ad Watches" in the 2012 Presidential Election

By Stephanie Petrich
Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications
2013, Vol. 4 No. 1 | pg. 3/3 |

V. Conclusions

This study sought to learn about how major broadcast media outlets use presidential campaign and ad watches during the 2012 presidential election.

Based on the analysis of the ad watches of the 2012 presidential campaign advertisements, the following conclusions were drawn. All ad watches featured campaign advertisements that attacked the opposing party, most ad watches contained fact checking, and most ad watches featured candidate sponsored ads. Overall, these results show that the ad watches by CNN, ABC and FOX News often involve negative or popular campaign advertisements, feature political analyst and anchor critiques, often involve fact checking the campaign advertisements, and use advertisements that do not feature war imagery.

These results are significant for the theory of media agenda setting because they reveal how the media shape public perception of political events. Watching ad watches on a major news network drastically influences how an individual might perceive certain candidates and even an election. Based on the results researchers can see that media outlets are more likely to use campaign advertisements with certain characteristics in their ad watches. This leads the viewers of these ad watches to receive specifically crafted messages and thus form a biased view of a candidate or election. The media, through these ad watches, are setting a specific political agenda that may ultimately influence the way the American electorate perceive a candidate when they see ad watches. Simply, the results show that the broadcast networks are analyzing and filtering campaign advertisements at their own discretion, and the audience is receiving a new, filtered message about these advertisements. The original campaign advertisement message would not be the same as the message the audience would finally get through an ad watch.

Additionally, this study tried to provide insight into why media outlets picked up certain political advertisements in the 2012 presidential election campaign. The majority of the ad watches in this study were for campaign advertisements that a candidate sponsored, attacked the opponent, and used patriotic and family imagery. Most ad watches typically occurred in the beginning months of an election cycle and very few,

if any, occurred as the months progressed closer to Election Day. In the beginning of the campaign season, media outlets may have been struggling to find campaign news to report, whereas closer to Election Day, the plethora of campaign news may crowd out ad watches. Also, as Election Day approached, the networks may focus more on fact checking campaign debates and speeches instead of the campaign advertisements.

Overall, this study contributed to the field of ad watches by finding the typical variables that may change the meaning of advertisements used in ad watches. However, this study only examined a small group of media outlets and ad watches, so the results cannot be generalized. Further research should be done on the media outlets’ political leanings, the analysts they chose to use for the ad watches, and how the ad watches of the 2012 presidential election compare to past presidential election ad watches. Perhaps, with this further research some general conclusions can be made about the reasoning behind why media outlets chose specific campaign advertisements. However, even without this additional research, this study contributed to the current research on ad watches in the 2012 presidential election. All in all, there is still a need for future research on this topic, but this study has added to the discussion of ad watches and political communication.


Acknowledgements

This author is thankful to Dr. Scott at Elon University for his supervision and advice, without which the articles could not be published. The author also appreciates numerous reviewers who have helped revise this article.


References

Bennett, C. (1997). Assessing the Impact of Ad Watches on the Strategic Decision-Making Process A Comparative Analysis of Ad Watches in the 1992 and 1996 Presidential Elections. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(8), 1161–1182.

Brooks, D. (2006). The Resilient Voter: Moving Toward Closure in the Debate over Negative Campaigning and Turnout. The Journal of Politics, 68(3), 684–696.

Cho, J., Gotlieb, M., Hwang, H., Nam-Jin, L., & McLeod, D. (2007). Campaign Ads, Online

Cho, J., Gotlieb, M., McLeod, D., McLeod, J., Scholl, R., & Shah, D. (2009). Campaigns, Reflection, and Deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R Model of Communication Effects. Communication Theory, 19, 66–88.

Clinton, J., & Lapinski, J. (2004). “Targeted” Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 69–96.

D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2000). Media Bias in Presidential Elections: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Communication, 133–156.

Fowler, E. F., & Ridout, T. N. (2009). Local Television and Newspaper Coverage of Political Advertising. Political Communication, 26(2), 119–136.

Freedman, P., & Goldstein, K. (1999). Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1189–1208.

Freedman, P., & Goldstein, K. (2002). Lessons Learned: Campaign Advertising in the 2000 Elections. Political Communication, 19(1), 5–28.

Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M., Tedesco, J. C., & Gaddie, K. (1999). Journalistic responsibility and political advertising: A content analysis of coverage by state and local media. Communication Studies, 50(4), 279–293.

Lau, R., Rovner, I., & Sigelman, L. (2007). The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1176–1209.

McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The Agenda Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.

Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

O’Sullivan, P. B., & Geiger, S. (1995). Does the Watchdog Bite? Newspaper AD Watch Articles and Political Attack ADS. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(4), 771–785.

Ridout, T. N., & Smith, G. R. (2008). Free Advertising How the Media Amplify Campaign Messages. Political Research Quarterly, 61(4), 598–608.

Rosenberry, J. and Vicker, L. (2009) Applied Mass Communication Theory. Pearson Education, Inc., MA.

Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N.-J., Scholl, R. M. and McLeod, D. M. (2007), Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model. Journal of Communication, 57: 676–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x

Stempel, G. (2003). Content analysis. In G. Stempel, D. Weaver, & G.C. Wilhoit (Eds.), Mass communication research and theory (pp. 209-219). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Sweetser, K. D., Golan, G. J., & Wanta, W. (2008). Intermedia Agenda Setting in Television, Advertising, and Blogs During the 2004 Election. Mass Communication and Society, 11(2), 197–216.

Tedesco, J. C., Kaid, L. L., & Melton McKinnon, L. (2000). Network Adwatches: Policing the 1996 Primary and General Election Presidential Ads. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 541–555.

Appendix A: Coding Sheet

Positive tone

 

Yes

 

No

Negative tone

 

Yes

 

No

Patriotic imagery

 

Yes

 

No

Family imagery

 

Yes

 

No

War imagery

 

Yes

 

No

Attacks on opposition

 

Yes

 

No

Policy centered

 

Yes

 

No

Candidate sponsored

 

Yes

 

No

PAC sponsored

 

Yes

 

No

Interest Group sponsored

 

Yes

 

No

Other sponsor

 

Yes

 

No

Specific for Ad Watches

       

Ad Watch identifier on screen

 

Yes

 

No

Fact checks

 

Yes

 

No

Analyst critique

 

Yes

 

No

Anchor critique

 

Yes

 

No







Appendix B: List of Links for the Ad Watches Analyzed

CNN (search term campaign ad)

1. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/10/09/exp-early-hamby-obama-big-bird-ad.cnn

2. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/10/16/tsr-moos-naked-politics.cnn

3. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2012/09/19/tsr-dnt-yellin-obama-redistribution.cnn

4. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2012/10/15/erin-intv-reiner-moveon-org-ad-johansson-longoria-washington.cnn

5. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/08/20/exp-early-lothian-romney-attack-ad.cnn

6. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/10/19/ac-kth-romney-obama-abortion-stance. cnn

7. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/08/08/exp-point-andrea-saul-one.cnn

8. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2011/11/22/tsr-johns-romney-obama-attack-ad.cnn

9. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/08/08/exp-point-steph-cutter-two.cnn

10. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/08/09/ac-kth-romney-welfare-ad.cnn

11. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/05/15/nr-ben-labolt.cnn

ABC (search term campaign ad)

1. http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/obama-ad-super-pac-back-16974192

2. http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/obama-romney-aim-early-voters-debate-17343494

3. http://gma.yahoo.com/video/gma-foulest-ads-campaign-season-080000372.html

4. http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/president-obamas-abortion-attack-ad-17036500

5. http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/fact-checking-obama-romney-campaign-ads-16744194

6. http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/obamas-osama-bin-laden-ad-attacks-romney-16231795

7. http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/chrysler-super-bowl-ad-pro-obama-15526038

FOX News (search term ad watch)

1. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1642688653001/2012-ad-wars/

2. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1617989208001/then-and-now-bush-2004-ad-vs-obama-2012-ad/

3. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1367630205001/watch-gingrich-no-longer-playing-nice-in-new-adtargeting-romney/

4. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1780360620001/carney-we-do-not-control-the-ad/

5. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1781717281001/super-pac-pack-of-lies-ad/

6. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1777328300001/coulter-this-is-a-repulsive-despicable-ad/

7. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1777146099001/controversy-over-obama-super-pac-ad/

8. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1686382884001/is-obamas-african-american-voter-ad-offensive/

9. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1778681624001/rnc-releases-ad-in-response-to-super-pac-ad-attacking-romney/

10. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1776144516001/attack-ad-a-new-low-for-the-obama-campaign/

11. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1778783862001/pressure-mounts-on-white-house-to-denouncesuper-pac-ad/

12. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1778516930001/firestorm-over-super-pac-ad-against-romney-grows/

13. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1777680796001/did-obama-campaign-lie-about-anti-romney-ad/

14. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1439439047001/rove-obama-campaign-co-opting-chrysler-superbowl-ad/

15. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1892816352001/new-ad-hammers-obama-administration-for-binladen-raid-leaks/

16. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1757923226001/obama-ad-on-romney-its-a-scary-time-to-be-awoman/

17. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1942536920001/bias-bash-calling-out-political-ad-double-standard/

18. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1932663259001/singing-children-warn-of-romneys-america-in-proobama-ad/

19. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1922530961001/hollywood-nation-clint-gets-political-again/

20. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1919886387001/president-obama-holding-campaign-event-in-fl/

21. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1887738563001/big-bird-ad-mocks-romneys-call-for-federal-spending-cut-at-presidential-debate/

RELATED ARTICLES